Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District
Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District is located in southeast Wisconsin. Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District has 8.48 square miles of land area and 0.75 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District population is 11,338. Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District median household income is $69,354 in 2010-2014. Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District median house value is $254,000 in 2010-2014. On average, Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,205 | 1,271 | 1,294 | 1,365 | 1,413 | 1,437 | 1,432 |
English Language Learner Students: | 1 | 21 | 19 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 23 |
Total Teachers: | 72.65 | 70.82 | 78.67 | 79.63 | 81.16 | 81.80 | 82.60 |
Prekindergarten: | 4.50 | 3.50 | 3.10 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 3.50 |
Kindergarten: | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.20 |
Elementary: | 34.77 | 33.62 | 38.62 | 39.98 | 40.54 | 42.90 | 47.60 |
Secondary: | 27.38 | 27.70 | 29.95 | 30.15 | 30.12 | 29.40 | 25.30 |
Ungraded: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 55.51 | 56.97 | 54.65 | 51.02 | 51.93 | 50.30 | 55.40 |
Instructional Aides: | 19.68 | 17.42 | 15.22 | 12.66 | 12.12 | 12.80 | 9.40 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.20 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.70 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
District Administrators: | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 1.40 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.25 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.50 |
School Administrators: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 3.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 6.00 | 6.87 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.20 | 3.10 |
Student Support Services: | 7.21 | 6.92 | 6.62 | 7.42 | 6.28 | 7.40 | 11.30 |
Other Support Services: | 12.25 | 13.76 | 13.81 | 12.87 | 13.16 | 13.50 | 17.90 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.59 | 17.95 | 16.45 | 17.14 | 17.41 | 17.57 | 17.34 |
Schools
Hartland Fine Arts Leadership Academy | Kindergarten to Grade 2 | 232 Church St, Milwaukee WI 53209 | |
Hartland School Of Community Learning | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 651 East Imperial Dr, Hartland WI 53029 | |
Life Charter School | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 800 East North Shore Dr, Hartland WI 53029 | |
North Elementary | Prekindergarten to Grade 2 | 232 Church St, Hartland WI 53029 | |
North Shore Middle | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 800 East North Shore Dr, Hartland WI 53029 | |
South Elementary | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 651 East Imperial Dr, Hartland WI 53029 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
WKCE Test | |||||
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 73% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 75% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88% | 77% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 75% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62% | 50% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96% | 81% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93% | 80% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 36% | 35% |
2004 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% |
2005 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78% |
2006 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% |
2007 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 76% |
2008 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 77% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 77% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 73% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 71% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 72% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 77% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 99% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69% | 50% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 81% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 81% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 81% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 98% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 39% | 33% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 80% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 78% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 77% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 77% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 90% |
2005 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 99% | 91% |
2006 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 91% |
2007 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 91% |
2008 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 92% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 98% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 98% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 92% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77% | 52% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 82% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 85% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 96% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 47% | 36% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 72% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 75% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73% | 54% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 84% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94% | 84% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 42% | 35% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 73% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 99% | 82% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65% | 49% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 87% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 87% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 96% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 99% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 48% | 38% |
2004 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 67% |
2005 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 64% |
2006 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 71% | 65% |
2007 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 73% | 61% |
2008 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 64% |
2009 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 77% | 65% |
2010 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 66% |
2011 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 69% | 63% |
2012 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 74% | 66% |
2013 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 61% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 65% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 72% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 73% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 80% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 46% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 79% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93% | 84% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 86% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 85% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 88% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 85% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 66% | 42% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 69% |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 73% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 74% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 76% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 84% |
2005 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% |
2006 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 83% |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% |
2010 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 82% |
2011 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% |
2012 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82% |
2013 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 94% | 83% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $18,344,000 | $14,176 | $19,290,000 | $14,132 | $18,991,000 | $13,440 | |||
Federal: | $1,012,000 | $782 | 5.5% | $1,505,000 | $1,103 | 7.8% | $1,152,000 | $815 | 6.1% |
State: | $5,361,000 | $4,143 | 29.2% | $5,801,000 | $4,250 | 30.1% | $5,795,000 | $4,101 | 30.5% |
Local: | $11,971,000 | $9,251 | 65.3% | $11,984,000 | $8,779 | 62.1% | $12,044,000 | $8,524 | 63.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $17,252,000 | $13,332 | $18,671,000 | $13,678 | $17,178,000 | $12,157 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $15,038,000 | $11,621 | $16,727,000 | $12,254 | $15,567,000 | $11,017 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $8,533,000 | $6,594 | 56.7% | $9,800,000 | $7,179 | 58.6% | $9,574,000 | $6,776 | 61.5% |
Student and Staff Support: | $1,111,000 | $859 | 7.4% | $1,459,000 | $1,069 | 8.7% | $1,271,000 | $900 | 8.2% |
Administration: | $3,042,000 | $2,351 | 20.2% | $3,073,000 | $2,251 | 18.4% | $2,587,000 | $1,831 | 16.6% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $2,352,000 | $1,818 | 15.6% | $2,395,000 | $1,755 | 14.3% | $2,135,000 | $1,511 | 13.7% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $469,000 | $362 | $227,000 | $166 | $288,000 | $204 | |||
Construction: | $130,000 | $100 | $15,000 | $11 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $302,000 | $233 | $286,000 | $210 | $247,000 | $175 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $204,000 | $158 | $290,000 | $212 | $420,000 | $297 | |||
Total Salary: | $7,410,000 | $5,726 | $7,645,000 | $5,601 | $7,791,000 | $5,514 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $5,460,000 | $4,219 | 73.7% | $5,426,000 | $3,975 | 71.0% | $5,621,000 | $3,978 | 72.1% |
Other Salary: | $1,950,000 | $1,507 | 26.3% | $2,219,000 | $1,626 | 29.0% | $2,170,000 | $1,536 | 27.9% |
Total Benefit: | $4,583,000 | $3,542 | $5,619,000 | $4,116 | $4,892,000 | $3,462 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $2,297,000 | $1,775 | 50.1% | $3,199,000 | $2,344 | 56.9% | $2,948,000 | $2,086 | 60.3% |
Other Benefit: | $2,286,000 | $1,767 | 49.9% | $2,420,000 | $1,773 | 43.1% | $1,944,000 | $1,376 | 39.7% |
* Hartland-Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.